Where certain essential cybersecurity requirements are not applicable to a product with digital elements, the manufacturer should include a clear justification in the cybersecurity risk assessment included in the technical documentation. This could be the case where an essential cybersecurity requirement is incompatible with the nature of a product with digital elements. For example, the intended purpose of a product with digital elements may require the manufacturer to follow widely recognised interoperability standards even if its security features are no longer considered to be state of the art. Similarly, other Union law requires manufacturers to apply specific interoperability requirements. Where an essential cybersecurity requirement is not applicable to a product with digital elements, but the manufacturer has identified cybersecurity risks in relation to that essential cybersecurity requirement, it should take measures to address those risks by other means, for instance by limiting the intended purpose of the product to trusted environments or by informing the users about those risks.
Recital 55 of 130
OFFICIAL TEXTRegulation (EU) 2024/2847·Official language version: English (EN)··Retrieved 2 November 2026·View on EUR-Lex
You are reading a consolidation made by regulation-cra.eu: the Official Journal text with its corrigenda and the amendments made by Regulation (EU) 2025/327 to Articles 13(4), 31(3) and 32(5a), which apply from 26 March 2027 (date to be verified). It is not an official consolidated version: only the texts published in the Official Journal are authentic. Versions and sources
OFFICIAL TEXTVerbatim, as published. Not rewritten.
(55)