Certain categories of products with digital elements should be subject to stricter conformity assessment procedures, while keeping a proportionate approach. For that purpose, important products with digital elements should be divided into two classes, reflecting the level of cybersecurity risk linked to those categories of products. An incident involving important products with digital elements that fall under class II might lead to greater negative impacts than an incident involving important products with digital elements that fall under class I, for instance due to the nature of their cybersecurity-related function or the performance of another function which carries a significant risk of adverse effects. As an indication of such greater negative impacts, products with digital elements that fall under class II could either perform a cybersecurity-related functionality or another function which carries a significant risk of adverse effects that is higher than for those listed in class I, or meet both of the aforementioned criteria. Important products with digital elements that fall under class II should therefore be subject to a stricter conformity assessment procedure.
Recital 44 of 130
OFFICIAL TEXTRegulation (EU) 2024/2847·Official language version: English (EN)··Retrieved 2 November 2026·View on EUR-Lex
You are reading a consolidation made by regulation-cra.eu: the Official Journal text with its corrigenda and the amendments made by Regulation (EU) 2025/327 to Articles 13(4), 31(3) and 32(5a), which apply from 26 March 2027 (date to be verified). It is not an official consolidated version: only the texts published in the Official Journal are authentic. Versions and sources
OFFICIAL TEXTVerbatim, as published. Not rewritten.
(44)